Safecastle has been helping customers prepare for crises since early 2002. We have long-standing dealership arrangements with all the top names in the preparedness industry. We have sold our customers hundreds of thousands of cans of long-term storage food. Our online store is designed to provide you with a safe and secure environment to browse our product offerings.
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
Credibility is Crucial for Preppers
by JC Refuge
Here's a topic that's worth a book … or at least a whole
chapter in a behavioral self-help volume. But time is money and no one's paying
here, so I'll try to spare us too many of the embellishments and get down to
the basics.
Context example in
the military/intell community
Long ago and far away, a young intelligence analyst in the
field was slaving away at collating and analyzing info collected from all
available sources for the weekly general staff briefing. The Warsaw Pact forces
across the border were in a definite upswing in exercise activity (which always
had an NBC focus). This particular point in time found an unusual massing of
East German, Czech, and Russian tank and motorized rifle divisions within
several clicks of the border with West Germany. Soviet missile forces were also
geared up and hauling their missiles to and fro’ in the countryside. The young
analyst sensed that this might be something truly out of the ordinary, given
some of his superiors’ obviously increased tension. This was soon confirmed
when the Intel Center's full-bird commander took it upon himself to calmly
commit his opinion to the general staff that this was the real deal coming down
the autobahn … that the proverbial balloon was poised to launch. Interestingly,
the general staff seemed concerned, but not at all panicked like a few of their
underlings. Nonetheless, they reacted by placing their divisions on an elevated
alert status.
The young analyst, through the process of regularly changing
his shorts, learned much that week about the games played by the superpowers
during the Cold War.
But most enduring of all was the lesson delivered on
credibility--how important it is to have it when you need it, and how easily it
can be frittered away. The aforementioned full-bird held the respect of the
generals and they followed his advice, taking steps to increase defensive
preparations for West Germany in case the colonel was right.
Obviously, though, he was wrong. And shortly thereafter, the
colonel retired to his spread in Virginia. Be assured … no tears were shed. The
colonel was aged beyond his years and had performed his duties well through his
accomplished career. In the end, he took responsibility for a move that he felt
someone had to make. He had the stuff it took to make things happen, and people
would listen to him, so he made the call. Yes, it unfairly cost him some small
measure of his accumulated credibility with the general staff, and perhaps
hastened the end of his career somewhat, but what good is credibility when you
don’t use it when needed?
Or worse yet, what good are you if you don't have any
credibility built up to draw from when you come to that point in time when you
need people to listen?
Why is YOUR
credibility important as a prepper?
OK, so the fate of the free world does not depend on your
reading of the signs. And we can all be thankful for that. ;) But by golly, if
you have friends and family whom you’d like to be able to influence, either now
or later, then your credibility is key. Do you have it with them now? Will they
listen and trust you when it's most important that they do? For some of them,
the best gift you could give may be reason to respect what you have to tell
them.
If your credibility with those closest to you is shot or
could use improvement, don’t despair. You’re in the company of thousands of
other preppers who could use a credibility boost. It comes with the territory …
just like it does in the intelligence business. The good news is that, what you
do from this moment forward can serve to begin repairing and managing that
credibility so that it’s there when you decide you really, really need it.
If you build it they
will come
Credibility is people measuring how deserving you are of
their confidence … how capable you are of being believed.
In other words, it's about how you present yourself and your
opinions. Yes, you are responsible for how others view you. Take responsibility
for it and work on it and you might be surprised at how persuasive you can be
with those around you.
Nine real-world tips
... many readily apparent, and maybe a few that aren't for
some …
1. Don’t lie. Don’t exaggerate. It will be noted and
remembered.
2. Manage your emotions. Even when feeling stressed and
feeling an urgency about a situation, stay calm and present your point of view
rationally and as matter-of-factly as possible. Don’t be drawn into emotional
arguments.
3. Cultivate the belief within yourself that the world is
open to many interpretations and outcomes. Respect that and then gracefully
grant the right for others to disagree with you.
4. Restrict yourself to sharing info and views that fall
within the realm of conventional wisdom. Few “trailblazers” or “out of the box
thinkers” ever score credibility points for sharing unconventional thought
processes, and those that do often are credited for those points only long
after they are dead.
5. Do not “invest in” or commit yourself to any one outcome
or analysis. More often than not, it will be wrong. Always couch your
presentations in terms like “possible,” “potential for,” “something to
consider,” etc.
6a. Present even “important facts” as being interesting to
consider, but not critical to embrace, even when you might think otherwise.
6b. Present your analyses/forecasts as being a possible read
or outcome; not the only read or outcome.
7. Admit your humanity. When the facts change, openly adjust
your thinking.
8. Don't take yourself too seriously. Confidently exhibit a
sense of humor about your perspectives.
9. Assume a wise and stoic personna, even when others are
expressing views counter to your own. Choose very carefully your opportunities
for getting across the most important points. “Evangelists” rarely are seen as
credible by most people.
The old-fashioned way
Respect and credibility are closely related … they are both
earned with discipline and commitment. You can get by without it, but be aware
that you'll be traveling alone.
Sunday, June 01, 2014
June 1st Loyalty Drawing Prize Winner Arrounced.. sign up for a chance to
Loyalty Drawing Prize Winner for June 1st: Customer#11857
Vital Grill Survival Stove
Winner gets it for FREE!! (Retail Value: $87.5)
With the VitalGrill Stove, you can cook anywhere any time by using whatever dry biological material is at hand as a source of fuel: pieces of wood, paper, cardboard, twigs, straw, natural fibers, charcoal and combustible waste.
Check out the pictures and Video here
This year's Loyalty Royalty program is a slam-dunk in terms of getting something for nothing. In fact, for some, it will be a lot for nothing. Our buyers club members simply need to email us (jcrefuge@gmail.com) and request to be enrolled in the 2014 Loyalty program. That's it! If you are not a member, become one today, click here
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Ready for a Nuclear Event?
by JC Refuge
Revisiting a very practical and handy Rand Corporation book, "Individual Preparedness and Response to Chemical, Radiological, Nuclear, and Biological Terrorist Attacks," we can be reminded of some of the basic how-to’s involved with nuclear readiness.
"A nuclear detonation has several immediate effects: a
powerful blast that knocks over buildings, high-energy prompt radiation from
the nuclear reaction, a strong flash of light and heat, and an electromagnetic
pulse that may interfere with electronic equipment. The distance those effects
are felt from the detonation depends on the size of the weapon and how high
above the ground the detonation occurs. In the Cold War, attacks were expected
to have involved many strikes with very large weapons (hundreds of kilotons).
While it is not possible to predict the characteristics of future terrorist
attacks, they are probably more likely to use a single smaller weapon that
ranges from less than a kiloton to 10 kilotons and are likely to detonate the
nuclear device on the ground, not in the air. A ground burst will have reduced
blast effects but will produce a larger footprint on the ground of the highly
radioactive fallout cloud, extending possibly tens of miles. This fallout could
be lethal to those in its path who are not well protected. Nuclear attacks will
also significantly damage infrastructure, not only to buildings but also to
utilities, electronics, and other services.
Revisiting a very practical and handy Rand Corporation book, "Individual Preparedness and Response to Chemical, Radiological, Nuclear, and Biological Terrorist Attacks," we can be reminded of some of the basic how-to’s involved with nuclear readiness.
To see the entire monograph in pdf form, go to: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1731/index.html
Excerpt - Nuclear
Attack
"A nuclear detonation has several immediate effects: a
powerful blast that knocks over buildings, high-energy prompt radiation from
the nuclear reaction, a strong flash of light and heat, and an electromagnetic
pulse that may interfere with electronic equipment. The distance those effects
are felt from the detonation depends on the size of the weapon and how high
above the ground the detonation occurs. In the Cold War, attacks were expected
to have involved many strikes with very large weapons (hundreds of kilotons).
While it is not possible to predict the characteristics of future terrorist
attacks, they are probably more likely to use a single smaller weapon that
ranges from less than a kiloton to 10 kilotons and are likely to detonate the
nuclear device on the ground, not in the air. A ground burst will have reduced
blast effects but will produce a larger footprint on the ground of the highly
radioactive fallout cloud, extending possibly tens of miles. This fallout could
be lethal to those in its path who are not well protected. Nuclear attacks will
also significantly damage infrastructure, not only to buildings but also to
utilities, electronics, and other services.
"Timelines.
The prompt effects of nuclear weapons are essentially instantaneous—they last
for a minute or less. The fires caused by the heat from the detonation start
soon after but are not likely to become a broad fire for 20 minutes or more.
Radioactive particles from the fallout cloud begin to fall to the ground 10–15
minutes after the detonation near the spot of the detonation. Farther away, the
radioactive fallout begins to land soon after the cloud passes overhead. After
about 24 hours, all the fallout is deposited. The radioactivity in the fallout
is extremely high early on. However, after two days, it will have decreased in
intensity significantly (by a factor of 100 compared to one hour after the
blast).
"Detection.
A nuclear detonation will be unmistakable from the moment it occurs. The bright
flash, the widespread physical destruction, the searing heat, and the mushroom
cloud are unique. During the Cold War, the attack would have been detected as
satellites tracked missiles on their 30-minute journey to the United States
from Russia, which would have given individuals a chance to get to a fallout
shelter. Terrorists are much more likely to deliver the weapon surreptitiously,
perhaps by a truck or ship, rather than by missile. Hence, there would be
little chance for early detection and warning.
"Support from
Officials/Governments. Government officials would be unlikely to provide
support until well after the detonation. Initial activities would include
providing medical care to survivors, rescuing people from areas that are safe
enough to enter briefly, and informing individuals when the fallout radiation
was low enough that individuals could leave their shelters and the contaminated
fallout area."
Response Strategy
"In a surprise attack, an individual cannot avoid the
initial effects of a nuclear detonation—blast, heat, and prompt radiation.
However, the dangers from exposure to the radioactive fallout from the cloud
that will form shortly thereafter can be reduced significantly. This will
require that an individual locate the area of this radioactive cloud and act
quickly. The individual’s overarching goal would be to avoid fallout by either
quickly evacuating the fallout zone or seeking the best available shelter.
Recommended Actions
"1. Move out of the path of the radioactive fallout
cloud as quickly as possible (less than 10 minutes when in immediate blast
zone) and then find medical care immediately.
"Individuals can best protect themselves by evacuating
the area where the radioactive fallout is likely to land. This is the case
because evacuation provides protection that is full and indefinite and is
appropriate for wherever the attack occurs and for different variations in an
attack. It makes possible access to medical care, which will be critical to
individuals in the blast zone who may have absorbed a high dose of prompt
radiation from the detonation or sustained injuries from the blast and heat. It
is also low in cost and requires little preparation. The fallout zone is
defined as that area in which the fallout will generate 100 rad over 24 hours.
"Evacuation affords such protection because the onset
of the radioactive fallout is not immediate but is expected to begin 10–15
minutes after the detonation in the vicinity of the blast and extend for hours
as the radioactive cloud moves downwind. Thus, a shortcoming of evacuation in
attacks involving chemical or radiological weapons—that it cannot be done
quickly enough to provide adequate protection—does not hold in this case.
"Evacuation also protects against the hazard of large
fires that may emerge in the blast zone within 20 minutes or so after the
detonation and could endanger individuals in shelters.
"The distances an individual must travel to evacuate
the fallout zone are not large. Even for a 10-kiloton weapon, a person located
anywhere in the region between the blast site and up to about 10 kilometers (6
miles) downwind of the blast site would need to travel less than 2 kilometers
(1.2 miles) to evacuate the most dangerous fallout area. Even where the
radioactive cloud is at its widest, some 20 to 50 kilometers (10 to 30 miles)
downwind, an individual would only need to travel at most about 5 kilometers (3
miles). In this latter case, more than 10 minutes would be available for
evacuation because it would take some time for the cloud to reach that
distance. Because roads are likely to be impassable for automobiles in many
areas because of damage, debris, or traffic, individuals should evacuate on
foot.
"The primary considerations for this action are knowing
whether one is in an area that may become contaminated by radioactive fallout
and, if so, knowing which direction to take. Fallout is likely to cover a
portion of the blast zone. Thus, anyone in the blast zone, which will be
characterized by severe damage and broken windows even at its outer periphery,
is in danger of contamination from radioactive fallout. The fallout zone will
extend some 20– 80 kilometers (10–50 miles) downwind, depending on the weapon’s
size and the local winds. The downwind fallout zone will be less clearly
delineated than the blast zone, but its approximate location can be determined
by observing the mushroom cloud and the direction in which the wind seems to be
blowing.
"To evacuate from the blast zone, individuals should
move directly away from the blast center until they are clear. The location of
the center will be apparent from the initial bright flash and subsequent vertical
rise of a mushroom cloud. If the location of the detonation cannot be
determined quickly, individuals should walk in the direction of less damage,
where more buildings are standing and where there are fewer broken windows.
"Individuals outside the blast zone who are in the
radioactive cloud path (including those who evacuated in a downwind direction
from the blast zone) should move in a cross-wind direction until out from
underneath the path of the developing radioactive cloud. To determine the wind direction,
individuals should look for the direction that the mushroom cloud or smoke from
fires is going and go perpendicular to it. If they can feel the wind, they
should walk with the wind in their ears.
"Although individuals may not feel any symptoms, those
in the blast zone may have absorbed a high dose of prompt radiation from the
detonation. Thus, we highly recommend that such individuals receive immediate
medical care once outside the fallout area because such care could be essential
for survival.
"2. If it is not possible to move out of the path of
the radioactive fallout cloud, take shelter as far underground as possible or
if underground shelter is not available, seek shelter in upper floors of a
multistory building.
If evacuation is impossible, shelter is essential for anyone
remaining in the path of the radioactive fallout cloud. Radiation from local
fallout can be intense, delivering a lethal dose to an unprotected person in an
area up to 8 kilometers (5 miles) downwind of the detonation within an hour,
depending on the size of the weapon. To protect against this radiation,
individuals should get as much solid material (dirt, concrete, or masonry) and
space as possible between themselves and the fallout, which collects on the
ground and roofs of buildings. The best shelter is well below ground level, in
the sub-basement of a building, a subway tunnel, or the lowest level of an
underground garage. These shelters can reduce exposure levels by factors of
1,000 or higher.
"If an individual cannot get to an underground shelter
within the timelines of the arrival of the radioactive fallout, the next best
shelter would be in the upper floors of a multistory building (greater than 10
stories) but at least three stories below the roof to avoid the fallout
deposited there. Protection is best as far as possible from the outside walls.
Such a shelter can provide protection factors of 100 or higher, but it could be
significantly less if the windows or structures have been damaged.
"Ordinary house basements provide inadequate protection
in areas of intense radioactive fallout because they provide protection factors
of only 10–20. However, at distances greater than about 25 kilometers (15
miles) from the detonation, where the levels of radiation will be much less,
they could be sufficient. Nevertheless, because it could be difficult to know
where you are in relation to the detonation and because the yield of the weapon
is not known, the more shelter the better. In all cases, once inside the
shelter, shut off all air circulation systems and close off doorways and
windows. The room should not be sealed completely, because enough air will be
needed to breathe for at least 48 hours. Individuals should remain in the
shelter and await guidance from officials about when it is safe to leave, which
could take 24 to 48 hours. Individuals should attempt to gain access to their
emergency supply kit for use while in the shelter, but it is better to reach a
good shelter in time without the kit. The ideal shelter would be prestocked
with supplies to support occupants for two to three days.
"3. Find ways to cover skin, nose, and mouth, if it
does not impede either evacuating the fallout zone or taking shelter.
Although radioactive fallout will not begin to land in the
blast zone and surrounding areas for at least 10 minutes, some radioactive
particles and dust are likely to be present from the detonation. Therefore,
individuals should take the precautionary step of protecting themselves from
this radiation. Respiratory protection can be achieved by using particulate
filter masks or other expedient measures, such as covering the nose and mouth
with clothing or towels. (See the discussion in radiological attack section.)
It is important to note that, in contrast to a radiological bomb, the primary
hazard from radioactive fallout is radiation absorbed from outside the body.
Respiratory protection steps, therefore, will provide only limited protection.
As a result, we recommend that respiratory protection be retrieved and donned
but only if this causes no more than a few moments delay in evacuating the
fallout zone or finding shelter.
"The radiation in nuclear fallout consists primarily of
gamma emitters but also includes beta radiation. Protective clothing provides
no protection from gamma radiation, although it can provide significant
protection from beta radiation.
"We therefore recommend covering exposed skin but again
only if it does not impede evacuating or taking shelter. In this context, any
clothing that covers exposed skin and the head is considered protective
clothing. Thus, most fully dressed individuals would only need a hat or hood.
Protective clothing has the additional advantage of facilitating
decontamination by providing a layer that can be quickly removed to dispose of
any fallout material that may have accumulated on a person during evacuation or
prior to sheltering.
"4. Decontaminate as soon as possible once protected
from the fallout. Decontamination can provide protection for anyone who has
spent time in the area of the nuclear blast or the radioactive fallout zone by
eliminating exposure from radioactive particulates (dust) that have adhered to
the body. Decontamination should initially focus on removing outer clothing,
including shoes, and securing it in a bag or other container. Individuals
should minimize contact of radioactive material with skin and eyes by rinsing
exposed skin, removing contact lenses, and showering as soon as possible.
Contaminated clothing should be treated or disposed of in accordance with
official guidance. Decontamination should be undertaken as quickly as possible
but only after an individual is protected from exposure to fallout by
evacuation or sheltering.
"5. If outside the radioactive fallout area, still take
shelter to avoid any residual radiation. Because uncertainty exists about
exactly where the radioactive cloud will travel and where the fallout will
land, it is important for individuals outside the apparent fallout zone to take
shelter. House or building basements should provide sufficient
protection."
__________________________________________
One note on RAND's recommendation to evacuate if at all
possible, rather than sheltering ...
If you have a well-built, well-stocked fallout shelter
within easy reach, I believe reaching that protection is preferable to
evacuation. Why? Because of the uncertainty of what awaits in areas where you
might flee to. In my view, it's far better to take the certain safety of your
shelter over the uncertain circumstances that await evacuees over the horizon.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Folding Bikes + Free Case + Free Shipping + Huge Savings (up to 30% off), Need we say more ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Change is inevitable … Are you ready?
By JC Refuge
Change is inevitable. It's always been so, yet rarely has
"progress" been so strenuously dramatic as what we are experiencing
in the 21st century.
Change in and of itself causes fear and resistance in most
people. We are creatures of habit and we all develop our own little comfort
zones from which we view and interpret the world around us. Normally, we can
remain largely in control of at least that personal space so that the changes
which otherwise encroach all around us are taken on at a manageable pace.
The key to the success of that kind of personal dynamic is
that others out there are not too aggressive or insistent on us to change our
ways before we are ready to. This allows us to feel that we retain our freedom
of choice ... even if the only choice is whether to get on board now or later.
History Suddenly
Morphs
Yet personal choice is not always a given. Human history
tends to periodically convulse, usually in the form of violent conflict. These
historical mile markers show up when the world as it was, is no longer.
Contemporary populations are forced to adapt to explosively overpowering
realities. World War II comes to mind as a fairly recent example.
Today, revolutionary levels of technological advancement,
global access to the new technologies, resulting oppressive multi-cultural
compression, and good-old-fashioned human nature in the form of resistance to
change, create a volatile mix that seemingly must ignite and explode before it
will clear off.
Virtually nothing today in the world is as it was 25 years
ago--certainly not international ethnic attitudes, with emerging hatreds of
every flavor competing daily for highest-casualty head-count--sometimes
literally. And can my recollection be so bad as to be candy-coating memories of
not that many years ago when America had many trusted allies and most border
crossings were routine and more welcoming than threatening?
It's one big, hot kitchen today. Pots are simmering on all
burners and there are plenty of cooks in line to stir them. Tension and
mistrust, pride and envy are a few of the base human ingredients being allowed
to fold into each other. Worst of all, emotionally rooted belief systems are at
odds with each other, being forced into the same recipe--one that is supposed
to be suitable for all palates.
We are living this socio-culinary experiment without a plan
B. The only satisfaction being found is for those with a taste for violence,
and that is being served up in many parts of the world.
Niche groups pushing aggressive, intolerant agendas and
imperial despots looking to expand horizons are leading the way. Keeping global
order will require a popular level of resolve that quite simply is not in place
among the masses who are instead determined to remain familiarly comfortable
for as long as possible. Surely, the vast majority of people in the world want
to opt for peace, but given the malleable passivity of the various large
majorities, significant various violent causes have little to fear, and their
momentum becomes virtually unstoppable at some point. Resisting or not
resisting that momentum ... either way, the global dynamic is changing
radically, in short order.
What Endures?
The question that has no sure answer--what will become of
the world? Those of us who prepare for potential crises would like to believe
that our own existence will be a positive experience.
But can we be sure? We cannot even forecast with assurance
the variables that will determine new realities. But those who feel there is
radical change ahead in some form are likely on track.
How comfortable can we hope to be? Will cultural traditions
such as family holidays, baseball, and Boy Scouts endure? Will institutions
such as freedom to worship and precedence of family continue unaltered? Will
representative government and personal liberties remain possible? Will public
utilities and food supplies be dependable? Will neighbors open their doors to
each other?
There are certainly lots of opinions on outcomes, causes,
and effects. In the end, what matters is the moment. Be ready to adapt and make
choices quickly based on your values and your position of readiness. At crunch
time, you may not have the opportunity to think through options, so it might be
best to solidify your philosophical outlook now. I can't spell that out for you
and no one else should either.
But one suggestion to take into consideration: death and suffering is not the worst-case
outcome to seek to avoid. It may very well be that a just cause or position of
belief is larger than any of us.
Monday, May 19, 2014
Clarified butter (Ghee) is back in Stock !! Limited Supplies.
| ||||||||
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
How Prepared Do You Need to Be?
by JC Refuge
“How prepared do I need to be?” That's the question folks who
are new to the crisis preparedness avocation ask over and over again.
Typically, they are looking for some kind of mathematical
formula ... presumably incorporating some combination of risk factors,
household size, skill sets, geography, and tea-leaf analysis.
I have to suggest that the perspective one should take is a
bit more philosophical and personal.
Easy Does It
Those I know out there who are very rational and comfortable
in their preparedness-related activities have almost unanimously come to one
conclusion. That is, prepare until you feel good. The proverbial
"zen" of readiness is of course attaining that narrow comfort zone
where all suddenly becomes well with the world, at least in your own frame of
reference.
Perhaps that's a bit obvious, but really, so many
well-meaning preppers get swept way out there, becoming focused on how their
worlds might devolve, implode, or disintegrate. In fact, some get so wrapped up
in the gloom and doom, that interestingly, they end up subconsciously (or even
overtly) hoping for realization of a catastrophe and losing a firm grip on
their day-to-day obligations and blessings.
There are no two ways around it ... mathematically, the odds
are long against any one of us being flattened by the fickle fist of fate.
Potential is always there, but I certainly would never bet the mortgage on a
lottery drawing.
Stay real. Stay cool. Being ready is more about daily peace
of mind than about obsessing over gaps in your contingency planning.
No one is ever going to be fully positioned for all
potential dangers. Just prepare till it feels about right, staying within your
budget. Growing peace of mind is the guaranteed payoff we can all reap if we
just keep things in perspective.
You decide what level of preparedness feels right, but in my
book, feeling right is defined as being in balance.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
















